Criticism Mounts Over UPA’s Tribal Politics Under Matiang’i

By East Africa Times Reporter 

The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) party, led by former Interior Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiang’i, is coming under increasing criticism for what opponents and civil society groups describe as a worrying drift into tribal politics.

Despite branding itself as a national movement committed to unity and reform, UPA has faced accusations of disproportionately favoring certain ethnic blocs in its leadership structure, candidate endorsements, and grassroots mobilization.

Political analysts say the party’s public rallies have consistently been dominated by ethnic rhetoric, raising fears of deepening divisions ahead of the 2027 elections. “UPA has failed to rise above tribal calculations,” noted Dr. Peter Langat, a Nairobi-based political scientist. “Instead of presenting a unifying agenda, it appears to be building its base by leaning on ethnic loyalties.”

Critics further argue that Matiang’i, while positioning himself as a reformist, has surrounded himself largely with allies from his Kisii community, sidelining leaders from other regions. This has fueled perceptions that UPA is more of a regional vehicle than a national party.

Civil society watchdogs have also warned that tribal-based mobilization risks inflaming tensions in an already polarized political environment. Calls are growing for Matiang’i and the UPA leadership to demonstrate inclusivity through action, not just words.

Adding to the criticism, journalists covering a recent UPA function complained that they were kept waiting for hours, only to listen to what they termed “empty rhetoric.” Many also expressed frustration at the lack of facilitation for their transport back, describing the incident as further evidence of the party’s disregard for professionalism and inclusivity.